grammar No, not, and non English Language & Usage Stack Exchange

“tend”; “tend to”; “tending”; “tending to”; “attend”; “attending to” … The developer, Google, indicated that the app’s privacy practices may include handling of data as described below. For more information, see the developer’s privacy policy.

So it has an appropriate meaning but is potentially more general. As far as I know it’s nevertheless the “standard” alternative in this context. “Covering” is often used by my wife (a registered nurse) in exactly the way of “manning the help desk” in that it denotes responsibility without implying specific activity.

Non-religious word for “blessed”

It’s important to note the context this is used in, as it could be the electorate of a whole country or the electorate of a local constituency. “Electorate” is usually a mass noun meaning “the collection of all voters”. Logically, then, “non-dead” might mean something like “not having died” (true of rocks and living people), and “undead” might mean “living.” But word constructions don’t always make sense. “Non-dead” isn’t a word and “undead” means non-living and supernaturally animated.

Is the use of a hyphen between “non” and an adjective strictly necessary?

In this particular case you won’t lose much meaning by reading them all as equivalents. An electorate is a defined geographic area that votes for the outcome of a single seat, or a set of seats. Electorate can also be used to refer to the collection of voters within that area. The electorate is the group of people who have the right to vote.

Using “non-” to prefix a two-word phrase

A voter is simply an individual person who votes, or potentially votes. Although there are lots of people who have the right to vote, not all of them exercise that right, so not everyone in an electorate is necessarily a voter. Constituents are people who live in a constituency. They don’t necessarily have the right to vote, but are still represented by the elected person. The not just negates the “one is smarter” i.e. not “one is smarter”.

“None of us is” vs “None of us are”, Which is Correct? duplicate

If there are too many interpretative choices in a non-hyphened usage to my liking, I will include the hyphen. I was always taught that the ‘man’ in ‘manning a desk’ had its origins in ‘managing’, not ‘man/men/male’, which meant it was not a sexist term and was an unnecessary overcorrection to change it. My workplace recently requested that we ‘person a desk’, which grated non current liabilities examples with me because it sounds awful and doesn’t fit with the phrase’s origins (at least as I was taught them). But perhaps the definition I was given in my youth was well-meaning but incorrect. One issue this question raises is that of being more precise in thinking about who is doing what.

As you can see, it is quite defined in which each word is used. I can’t think of any that could be used interchangeably at the moment. All of them have different usages and can quite clearly defined in that different contexts. Is there a specific rule, or set of rules, that can be followed to know when to use each word? I have noticed that not is usually used with a verb, but I think that there sometimes are exceptions although I can’t think of one now. Actually looks better because the “freak” is attached to the “non-” as much as it is to “control-“, without the space implying the presence of a phrase break.

Current Local Time in Hyderabad, Telangana, India

It’s less than one and much less than many.So its subject agreement is entirely arbitrary. I want to say on social media that I am blessed to have my daughter, but I am not religious and find it awkward when people respond saying that they are sending prayers my way. I appreciate the sentiment, but I’d still like a non-religious word that holds a similar connotation. There are thousands of different things you could say to avoid the term “man,” depending upon the context you’re facing. That being said, if “manning” is the perfect and precise word, you should use “manning.” Is there a non-gendered term for manning a station, as in manning the desk?

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers. That said, I then choose to put a hyphen between any word I choose… When I am using the implied meaning of the prefix (whether it is non(not) or otherwise) because at least I choose to make it known and not up to interpretation by any reader… What my intent is, and this is whenever I question the meanings that exist by definition that the reader may choose from.

Answers

It also seems that while all dictionaries (except Wiktionary) do not list “unintutive”, some dictionaries list “non-intuitive”/”nonintutitve” (Merriam Webster) while others only list “counter-intuitive” (Cambridge). A Constituent refers to a voter within a defined constituency. “Voters” are the people who vote (or more generally, those who are entitled to vote, whether they do so or not). It’s not singular either, but it’s even less plural.

The only ideas I can come up with are “stationed at” the desk or other clunky things. After quite some time searching I couldn’t find any rules in which those words obey to. As you can see in my linked sites though there are quite a few entries in which not is before a verb and little of any others. This is hard to draw a conclusion to make a hard and fast rule. Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. A sitting parliamentarian’s constituents are the voters within the electorate represented by him/her.

Best app in the world, but at a search bar to the effects when you make a video

  • It’s important to note the context this is used in, as it could be the electorate of a whole country or the electorate of a local constituency.
  • Similarly, one reads nonnegative, nonmagnetic, nonferrous, etc.
  • Whether right or wrong, it claims that no single person in the group can outperform the whole group working together — so we should use our combined intelligence.
  • I would use it to mean all those represented, whether they are voters or not, but there is room for some argument there.

Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic. The electorate is a collective term for all voters.

  • I appreciate the sentiment, but I’d still like a non-religious word that holds a similar connotation.
  • “tend”; “tend to”; “tending”; “tending to”; “attend”; “attending to” …
  • One issue this question raises is that of being more precise in thinking about who is doing what.
  • This version and its common interpretation express the intended motivating sentiment.

The not applies to the whole sentence, not just the word one. It’s still one is smarter and therefore it’s still none is smarter. Having said all that, to get to your specific question, the sentence None of us is as smart as all of us is absolutely correct. In this case, however, I believe “is” is more appropriate to stress the meaning that no individual is as smart as the collective all of us.

Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) is originally referring to mean solar time at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, London. GMT and Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) can be seen equivalent when fractions of a second are not important. Authorization is only required to store your personal settings. Correct local time in Hyderabad, India timezone, official time change dates winter time 2025 daylight saving dates, DST, clock change, GMT/UTC difference. It is a legitimate word that has been underused owing to a couple of other equivalents that have been used more often.


Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *